This is an interesting debate about whether a ban on selling fur in West Hollywood is significant in a wider animal rights context. Why ban fur and still sell leather? It seems to be that fur is seen as a less justifiable use of animals than leather or wool, why should this be the case?
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/09/25/ban-fur-then-why-not-leather
A Vegan Outreach group based in Lincoln/Lincs but operating across the whole of the East Midlands.
No comments:
Post a Comment